Supreme Court Nixes Download Hearing

PAY FOR PLAY: The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear a former Boston University student's constitutional challenge to a $675k penalty for illegally downloading and sharing 30 songs on the Internet, though his lawyer still insists there's a chance the amount could be reduced. A jury in 2009 ordered Joel Tenenbaum to pay that amount after ascertaining he illegally downloaded and shared files while a student. A federal judge called the penalty constitutionally excessive, but the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated it at the request of the R.I.A.A. Tenenbaum's attorney, Harvard law professor Charles Nesson, said the Appeals court instructed a judge to consider reducing the award regardless of the bill's constitutionality. (5/21p)

UMG AND TIKTOK
WORK IT OUT
The kerfuffle is in the past. (5/2a)
LUCIAN SOUNDS OFF ON UMG/TIKTOK DEAL
A breakdown from the boss (5/2a)
HITS LIST: HANGIN' OUT
With extra relish (5/3a)
LIVE NATION POSTS (ANOTHER) RECORD QUARTER
More butts in seats than ever before. (5/3a)
A POST-WALLEN AFFAIR
A dynamic duo, y'all (5/3a)
THE NEW UMG
Gosh, we hope there are more press releases.
TIKTOK BANNED!
Unless the Senate manages to make this whole thing go away, that is.
THE NEW HUGE COUNTRY ACT
No, not that one.
TRUMP'S CAMPAIGN PLAYLIST
Now 100% unlicensed!
 Email

 First Name

 Last Name

 Company

 Country
CAPTCHA code
Captcha: (type the characters above)